<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malcolm Gladwell is Often Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtbasket.com/2009/09/15/malcolm-gladwell-is-often-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtbasket.com/2009/09/15/malcolm-gladwell-is-often-wrong/</link>
	<description>A place to hold my thoughts on various topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:28:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Tipping Point Flaws &#124; Thoughtbasket</title>
		<link>http://thoughtbasket.com/2009/09/15/malcolm-gladwell-is-often-wrong/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on Tipping Point Flaws &#124; Thoughtbasket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtbasket.com/?p=304#comment-637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] scenarios through various computer models of societies. Most interesting, and most daggerly through Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s theoretical heart, is that no matter what sort of connection scheme the researchers put in their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scenarios through various computer models of societies. Most interesting, and most daggerly through Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s theoretical heart, is that no matter what sort of connection scheme the researchers put in their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Successful Religions Just Lucky? &#124; Thoughtbasket</title>
		<link>http://thoughtbasket.com/2009/09/15/malcolm-gladwell-is-often-wrong/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Are Successful Religions Just Lucky? &#124; Thoughtbasket]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtbasket.com/?p=304#comment-604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] hypothesis of religious randomness is based on the work of Duncan Watts, a sociologist who I’ve mentioned before, in the context of showing that Malcolm Gladwell’s tipping point theory of “influencers” is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hypothesis of religious randomness is based on the work of Duncan Watts, a sociologist who I’ve mentioned before, in the context of showing that Malcolm Gladwell’s tipping point theory of “influencers” is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarely</title>
		<link>http://thoughtbasket.com/2009/09/15/malcolm-gladwell-is-often-wrong/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clarely]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtbasket.com/?p=304#comment-226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said! I&#039;ve finally gotten around to reading Blink and I&#039;m thoroughly underwhelmed. I enjoyed The Tipping Point, but funnily enough my favorite part of the book is the part that you, rightly, point out is irrelevant to most trends - Mavens and Connectors. I find it nifty, but it&#039;s hardly the backbone of what makes trends take off or not.

Basketball is all Greek to me, so I can&#039;t judge the current hoopla, but it doesn&#039;t surprise me that Gladwell has gotten into trouble here. He&#039;s a journalist, not a sociologist or psychologist, and while he draws on published studies, what he presents is all just theory, dressed up as fact.

I enjoyed reading this :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! I&#8217;ve finally gotten around to reading Blink and I&#8217;m thoroughly underwhelmed. I enjoyed The Tipping Point, but funnily enough my favorite part of the book is the part that you, rightly, point out is irrelevant to most trends &#8211; Mavens and Connectors. I find it nifty, but it&#8217;s hardly the backbone of what makes trends take off or not.</p>
<p>Basketball is all Greek to me, so I can&#8217;t judge the current hoopla, but it doesn&#8217;t surprise me that Gladwell has gotten into trouble here. He&#8217;s a journalist, not a sociologist or psychologist, and while he draws on published studies, what he presents is all just theory, dressed up as fact.</p>
<p>I enjoyed reading this <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

